home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- This file is copyright of Jens Schriver (c)
- It originates from the Evil House of Cheat
- More essays can always be found at:
- --- http://www.CheatHouse.com ---
- ... and contact can always be made to:
- Webmaster@cheathouse.com
- --------------------------------------------------------------
- Essay Name : 1373.txt
- Uploader : David Hembree
- Email Address : david.killer.hembrees.instinct@worldnet.att.net
- Language : English
- Subject : Computer
- Title : Cyberspace Freedom
- Grade : 99%
- School System : University of South Carolina
- Country : USA
- Author Comments :
- Teacher Comments :
- Date : 11-05-96
- Site found at : Friend
- --------------------------------------------------------------
- Being one of millions of surfers throughout the Internet, I see that fundamental civil liberties are
- as important in cyberspace as they are in traditional contexts. Cyberspace defined in WebsterÆs
- Tenth Edition dictionary is the on-line worlds of networks. The right to speak and publish
- using a virtual pen has its roots in a long tradition dating back to the very founding of democracy
- in this country. With the passage of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, Congress has prepared
- to turn the Internet from one of the greatest resources of cultural, social, and scientific
- information into the online equivalent of a childrenÆs reading room. By invoking the overboard
- and vague term ôindecentö as the standard by which electronic communication should be
- censored, Congress has insured that information providers seeking to avoid criminal prosecution
- will close the gates on anything but the most tame information and discussions.
- The Communications Decency Act calls for two years of jail time for anyone caught
- using ôindecentö language over the net; as if reading profanities online affects us more
- dramatically than reading them on paper. Our First Amendment states, ôCongress shall make no
- law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging
- the freedom of speech, or of the press....ö The Act takes away this right. The
- Constitution-defying traitors creating these useless laws do not they understand the medium
- theyÆre trying to control. What they ôclaimö is that they are trying to protect our children from
- moral threatening content.
- This ôprotect our helpless childrenö ideology is bogus. If more government officials
- were more knowledgeable about online information they would realize the huge flaw the
- Communication Decency Act contains. We donÆt need the government to patrol fruitlessly on
- the Internet when parents can simply install software like Net Nanny or Surf Watch. These
- programs block all ôsensitiveö material from entering oneÆs modem line. WhatÆs more,
- legislators have already passed effective laws against obscenity and child pornography. We
- donÆt need a redundant Act to accomplish what has already been written.
- Over 17 million Web pages float throughout cyberspace. Never before has information
- been so instant, and so global. And never before has our government been so spooked by the
- potential power ôlittle peopleö have at their fingertips. The ability for anyone to send pictures
- and words cheaply and quickly to potentially millions of others seems to terrify the government
- and control freaks. Thus, the Communications Decency Act destroys our own constitution rights
- and insults the dreams of Jefferson, Washington, Madison, Mill, Brandeis, and DeToqueville.
- ItÆs funny, now that we finally have a medium that truly allows us to exercise our First
- Amendment right, the government is trying to censor it. Forget them! Continue to engage in
- free speech on the net. ItÆs the only way to win the battle.
-
-
-
-
-
- David Hembree
- October 23, 1996
- Dr. Willis
- --------------------------------------------------------------
-